Ohio Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam

Premium Practice Questions

By InsureTutor Exam Team

Want To Get More Free Practice Questions?

Input your email below to receive Part Two immediately

[nextend_social_login provider="google" heading="Start Set 2 With Google Login" redirect="https://www.insuretutor.com/insurance-exam-free-practice-questions-set-two-2/" align="center"]
Here are 14 in-depth Q&A study notes to help you prepare for the exam.

Explain the concept of “bad faith” in insurance claims handling in Ohio, detailing specific actions that could constitute bad faith and the potential legal ramifications for an insurer found to be acting in bad faith. Reference relevant Ohio Revised Code sections and case law.

In Ohio, “bad faith” in insurance claims handling occurs when an insurer denies or delays payment of a valid claim without a reasonable justification. This goes beyond mere negligence; it requires the insurer to act with a dishonest purpose, malice, or ill will. Specific actions that could constitute bad faith include: failing to adequately investigate a claim, misrepresenting policy provisions, delaying payment without a reasonable basis, or offering a settlement substantially less than the claim’s value. Ohio Revised Code Section 3901.22 addresses unfair claim settlement practices, which can be indicative of bad faith. Case law, such as Slater v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co., further defines the elements of a bad faith claim. If an insurer is found to have acted in bad faith, they may be liable for compensatory damages (the amount of the original claim), consequential damages (losses resulting from the bad faith conduct), and potentially punitive damages (to punish the insurer for egregious behavior). The claimant bears the burden of proving bad faith by clear and convincing evidence.

Describe the process of subrogation in Ohio insurance claims. What rights does an insurer have to pursue subrogation, and what limitations are placed on those rights to protect the insured? Cite relevant Ohio case law and statutory provisions.

Subrogation is the legal right of an insurer to pursue a third party who caused a loss to the insured, to recover the amount of the claim paid to the insured. In Ohio, an insurer’s right to subrogation arises from either the insurance contract or by operation of law. The insurer essentially “steps into the shoes” of the insured to pursue the claim against the responsible party. However, Ohio law places limitations on this right to protect the insured. For example, the “made whole” doctrine dictates that the insured must be fully compensated for their loss before the insurer can exercise its subrogation rights. This means the insured must be reimbursed for all damages, including deductibles, uninsured losses, and pain and suffering, before the insurer can recover its payments. The Ohio Supreme Court case Northwestern Ohio Tractor Pullers Assn. v. Keith, 17 Ohio St.3d 203 (1985), is a key case addressing the made whole doctrine. Furthermore, the insurer must act reasonably and in good faith when pursuing subrogation, considering the insured’s interests.

Explain the concept of “comparative negligence” as it applies to liability claims in Ohio. How does Ohio’s modified comparative negligence rule affect the claimant’s ability to recover damages, and what are the implications for claims adjusters in evaluating liability?

Ohio operates under a modified comparative negligence system, as codified in Ohio Revised Code Section 2315.33. This means that a claimant can recover damages in a negligence action only if their own negligence is not greater than the combined negligence of all other persons from whom the claimant seeks recovery. If the claimant’s negligence is 51% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages. If the claimant’s negligence is 50% or less, their damages are reduced in proportion to their percentage of negligence. For claims adjusters, this requires a thorough investigation to determine the degree of fault attributable to each party involved. This assessment directly impacts the potential settlement value of the claim. Adjusters must carefully analyze evidence, witness statements, and police reports to accurately assess negligence and apply the comparative negligence rule. Failure to properly assess comparative negligence can lead to underpayment or overpayment of claims, potentially resulting in legal challenges.

Describe the requirements for providing notice of a claim under an Ohio insurance policy. What are the potential consequences for an insured who fails to provide timely notice, and what defenses might an insurer raise in such a situation?

Ohio law generally requires insureds to provide timely notice of a claim to their insurer, as stipulated in the insurance policy. The specific requirements for notice, including the timeframe and method of notification, are outlined in the policy’s terms and conditions. Failure to provide timely notice can be a valid defense for the insurer to deny coverage. However, Ohio courts typically require the insurer to demonstrate that they were prejudiced by the delay in notice. Prejudice means that the delay hindered the insurer’s ability to investigate the claim, defend against it, or otherwise protect its interests. The burden of proving prejudice rests on the insurer. Defenses an insurer might raise include that the delay prevented them from gathering crucial evidence, interviewing witnesses while memories were fresh, or taking steps to mitigate damages. The insured may argue that the delay was excusable due to circumstances beyond their control or that the insurer was not actually prejudiced by the delay.

Explain the concept of “uninsured/underinsured motorist” (UM/UIM) coverage in Ohio. What are the key differences between UM and UIM coverage, and how does Ohio law protect insureds who are injured by uninsured or underinsured drivers?

Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist (UM/UIM) coverage in Ohio protects insureds who are injured in an accident caused by a driver who either has no insurance (uninsured) or has insufficient insurance to cover the insured’s damages (underinsured). UM coverage applies when the at-fault driver has no insurance at all. UIM coverage applies when the at-fault driver has insurance, but the policy limits are not high enough to fully compensate the injured party for their losses. Ohio law, specifically Ohio Revised Code Section 3937.18, mandates that insurers offer UM/UIM coverage to their policyholders. The insured can reject this coverage in writing, but the offer must be made. Ohio law also addresses the process for making a UM/UIM claim, including the requirement to notify the insurer of a potential claim and to obtain their consent before settling with the at-fault driver’s insurance company. This consent requirement protects the insurer’s subrogation rights. The purpose of UM/UIM coverage is to ensure that innocent victims of negligent drivers are adequately compensated for their injuries, even when the at-fault driver lacks sufficient resources.

Discuss the role and responsibilities of the Ohio Department of Insurance (ODI) in regulating insurance claims handling practices. What are some of the common violations that the ODI investigates, and what are the potential penalties for insurers who violate Ohio insurance regulations?

The Ohio Department of Insurance (ODI) is the state agency responsible for regulating the insurance industry in Ohio, including claims handling practices. The ODI’s primary role is to protect consumers and ensure that insurers operate fairly and in compliance with Ohio insurance laws and regulations. The ODI investigates complaints from consumers regarding unfair claim settlement practices, such as unreasonable delays, wrongful denials, and misrepresentation of policy terms. Common violations investigated by the ODI include violations of Ohio Revised Code Section 3901.21 (unfair and deceptive acts and practices) and 3901.22 (unfair claim settlement practices). The ODI has the authority to conduct audits and examinations of insurance companies to ensure compliance. If the ODI finds that an insurer has violated Ohio insurance regulations, it can impose a range of penalties, including fines, cease and desist orders, suspension or revocation of the insurer’s license to operate in Ohio, and requirements for restitution to affected consumers. The ODI also publishes information and resources for consumers to help them understand their rights and responsibilities regarding insurance claims.

Explain the concept of “declaratory judgment” in the context of insurance coverage disputes in Ohio. Under what circumstances might an insurer or insured seek a declaratory judgment, and what are the key considerations for a court in deciding such a case?

A declaratory judgment is a legal action in which a party seeks a court’s determination of their rights and obligations under a contract or statute, without necessarily seeking monetary damages. In the context of insurance coverage disputes in Ohio, either the insurer or the insured may seek a declaratory judgment to resolve uncertainty about whether coverage exists for a particular claim. An insurer might seek a declaratory judgment if it believes that a policy exclusion applies or that the insured has violated a policy condition. An insured might seek a declaratory judgment if the insurer has denied coverage and the insured believes that coverage should be provided. Ohio Revised Code Chapter 2721 governs declaratory judgment actions. Key considerations for a court in deciding a declaratory judgment case involving insurance coverage include: the language of the insurance policy, the facts of the underlying claim, and relevant Ohio case law interpreting similar policy provisions. The court will typically construe the policy language according to its plain and ordinary meaning, resolving any ambiguities in favor of the insured. The burden of proving that an exclusion applies rests on the insurer.

Explain the concept of “bad faith” in the context of Ohio insurance claims adjusting, detailing specific actions that would constitute bad faith and the potential legal ramifications for an insurer found to be acting in bad faith, referencing relevant sections of the Ohio Revised Code.

“Bad faith” in Ohio insurance claims adjusting refers to an insurer’s intentional failure to fulfill its contractual obligations to the insured. This goes beyond mere negligence; it requires a dishonest purpose, conscious wrongdoing, or ill will. Specific actions that could constitute bad faith include: unreasonably delaying or denying a claim without proper investigation, misrepresenting policy provisions to avoid coverage, failing to promptly settle a claim where liability is reasonably clear, and compelling the insured to initiate litigation to recover amounts due under the policy. Ohio Revised Code Section 3901.22 outlines unfair claim settlement practices, which can be indicative of bad faith. While not explicitly defining “bad faith,” this section prohibits actions like failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications regarding claims, failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims, and refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation based upon all available information. If an insurer is found to be acting in bad faith, they may be liable for compensatory damages (the amount of the loss), consequential damages (damages resulting from the breach of contract), and, in some cases, punitive damages (intended to punish the insurer for egregious misconduct). The insured may also be able to recover attorney’s fees and other costs associated with pursuing the claim. The Ohio Supreme Court has established precedent regarding bad faith claims, emphasizing the insurer’s duty to act in good faith and deal fairly with its insured.

Describe the process of subrogation in Ohio insurance claims, including the rights and responsibilities of both the insurer and the insured. Provide an example scenario and cite relevant Ohio case law or statutes that govern subrogation rights.

Subrogation is the legal process by which an insurer, after paying a claim to its insured, acquires the insured’s rights to recover the loss from a third party who caused the damage. In essence, the insurer “steps into the shoes” of the insured to pursue a claim against the responsible party. The process typically involves the insurer notifying the responsible party (or their insurer) of its subrogation interest. The insurer then attempts to recover the amount it paid to its insured. The insured has a duty to cooperate with the insurer in the subrogation process, including providing information and documentation. The insured also retains the right to pursue any damages not covered by the insurance policy (e.g., deductible, pain and suffering). For example, if a driver is rear-ended by another driver and their insurance company pays for the repairs to their vehicle, the insurance company can then pursue a subrogation claim against the at-fault driver or their insurance company to recover the amount paid for the repairs. Ohio law recognizes the right of subrogation, although specific statutes may not explicitly define all aspects of the process. Case law, such as Northwestern Ohio Tractor Pullers Assn., Inc. v. Keith, provides guidance on the principles of subrogation and the rights and obligations of the parties involved. The specific terms of the insurance policy also play a crucial role in defining the scope of subrogation rights. The insurer must act reasonably and in good faith when pursuing subrogation, considering the insured’s interests as well.

Explain the concept of “comparative negligence” as it applies to liability claims in Ohio. How does Ohio’s modified comparative negligence rule (51% bar rule) affect the outcome of a claim, and what are the implications for both the claimant and the defendant?

Comparative negligence is a legal principle used in tort law to determine liability and damages when both the plaintiff (claimant) and the defendant are at fault in causing an injury. Ohio operates under a modified comparative negligence rule, often referred to as the “51% bar rule,” as codified in Ohio Revised Code Section 2315.33. Under this rule, a plaintiff can recover damages only if their own negligence is not greater than the combined negligence of all other parties from whom the plaintiff seeks recovery. In other words, if the plaintiff is 51% or more at fault, they are barred from recovering any damages. If the plaintiff’s negligence is 50% or less, they can recover damages, but the amount of damages they receive is reduced in proportion to their percentage of fault. For example, if a plaintiff is found to be 20% at fault and their total damages are $10,000, they would only recover $8,000. The implications for the claimant are significant. They must carefully assess their own level of fault before pursuing a claim, as exceeding the 50% threshold will result in no recovery. For the defendant, the comparative negligence rule provides a defense strategy to reduce or eliminate their liability by demonstrating that the plaintiff was also negligent and contributed to their own injuries. The burden of proof lies on the defendant to prove the plaintiff’s negligence.

Discuss the requirements and procedures for handling uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) claims in Ohio, including the insured’s responsibilities, the insurer’s obligations, and the potential for arbitration or litigation. Reference relevant sections of the Ohio Revised Code.

Ohio law mandates that insurers offer uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage to policyholders. UM coverage protects an insured who is injured by an uninsured driver, while UIM coverage protects an insured who is injured by a driver with insufficient insurance to cover the damages. Ohio Revised Code Section 3937.18 outlines the requirements for UM/UIM coverage. The insured has a responsibility to promptly notify their insurer of a potential UM/UIM claim and to cooperate with the insurer’s investigation. This includes providing documentation, attending medical examinations, and potentially giving a statement. The insurer has an obligation to investigate the claim in good faith and to offer a fair settlement if the insured is legally entitled to recover damages from the uninsured/underinsured driver. If the insurer and insured disagree on the value of the claim, the policy may provide for arbitration. Arbitration is a process where a neutral third party hears evidence and makes a binding or non-binding decision. If arbitration is unsuccessful or not available, the insured may file a lawsuit against the uninsured/underinsured driver and their own insurance company. The lawsuit against the insurance company is typically based on breach of contract, alleging that the insurer failed to provide the UM/UIM coverage required by the policy. The insured must prove that the uninsured/underinsured driver was negligent and caused their injuries, and that their damages exceed the available insurance coverage.

Explain the concept of “diminution of value” in Ohio auto insurance claims. Is an insured entitled to recover diminution of value damages in Ohio, and under what circumstances? Cite relevant Ohio case law or statutes.

Diminution of value (DOV) refers to the loss in market value of a vehicle after it has been damaged and repaired, even if the repairs are performed to a high standard. The argument is that a vehicle with a history of damage is worth less than a comparable vehicle that has never been damaged. Ohio law regarding the recovery of diminution of value is complex and not definitively settled by statute. Generally, an insured may be entitled to recover diminution of value damages in Ohio, but the circumstances are crucial. The key factor is whether the insured is making a claim against their own insurance policy (first-party claim) or against the at-fault driver’s insurance policy (third-party claim). In third-party claims, Ohio courts have generally allowed recovery for diminution of value if the vehicle was negligently damaged by another party. The burden of proof is on the claimant to demonstrate the loss in value. In first-party claims, the insurance policy language is paramount. Most standard auto insurance policies do not explicitly cover diminution of value. Therefore, recovery in a first-party claim is less likely unless the policy specifically provides for it. While there is no definitive Ohio Revised Code section addressing DOV, case law such as Rakich v. CEI Trucking, LLC provides some guidance. The specific facts of each case and the policy language will determine whether diminution of value damages are recoverable.

Describe the role and responsibilities of a licensed public adjuster in Ohio. How do their duties differ from those of an insurance company adjuster, and what regulations govern their conduct? Reference relevant sections of the Ohio Revised Code.

A licensed public adjuster in Ohio is a professional who represents the interests of policyholders in negotiating and settling insurance claims. Unlike insurance company adjusters, who represent the insurer, public adjusters work exclusively for the insured. Their primary responsibility is to assist the policyholder in preparing, documenting, and presenting their claim to the insurance company, with the goal of obtaining a fair and equitable settlement. The duties of a public adjuster include: reviewing the insurance policy, inspecting the damage, preparing an estimate of the loss, negotiating with the insurance company adjuster, and assisting the policyholder in understanding their rights and obligations under the policy. Ohio Revised Code Chapter 3951 governs the licensing and regulation of public adjusters. To become a licensed public adjuster in Ohio, individuals must meet certain qualifications, pass an examination, and obtain a surety bond. They are also subject to continuing education requirements. The regulations governing public adjusters aim to protect consumers from unethical or fraudulent practices. These regulations may include restrictions on advertising, limitations on fees, and requirements for disclosing conflicts of interest. Public adjusters are required to act in good faith and to represent their clients’ interests diligently.

Discuss the legal and ethical considerations surrounding the use of social media and other online resources in investigating insurance claims in Ohio. What are the potential privacy concerns, and what steps should an adjuster take to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations?

Investigating insurance claims often involves gathering information from various sources, including social media and other online resources. However, the use of these resources raises significant legal and ethical considerations, particularly concerning privacy. Adjusters must be mindful of Ohio’s privacy laws and regulations, as well as federal laws such as the Stored Communications Act. Accessing private social media profiles or engaging in deceptive practices to obtain information could violate these laws and expose the adjuster and the insurance company to legal liability. Ethically, adjusters should be transparent about their identity and purpose when interacting with individuals online. Creating fake profiles or “friending” claimants under false pretenses is generally considered unethical and could be viewed as an invasion of privacy. To ensure compliance, adjusters should: only access publicly available information, avoid using deceptive tactics, document all sources of information, and consult with legal counsel if they have any doubts about the legality or ethicality of their investigative methods. They should also be aware of the potential for information to be inaccurate or misleading and should verify any information obtained online before relying on it to make decisions about a claim. The adjuster must also adhere to the NAIC Model Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, which emphasizes fair and ethical claims handling.

Get InsureTutor Premium Access

Gain An Unfair Advantage

Prepare your insurance exam with the best study tool in the market

Support All Devices

Take all practice questions anytime, anywhere. InsureTutor support all mobile, laptop and eletronic devices.

Invest In The Best Tool

All practice questions and study notes are carefully crafted to help candidates like you to pass the insurance exam with ease.

Video Key Study Notes

Each insurance exam paper comes with over 3 hours of video key study notes. It’s a Q&A type of study material with voice-over, allowing you to study on the go while driving or during your commute.

Invest In The Best Tool

All practice questions and study notes are carefully crafted to help candidates like you to pass the insurance exam with ease.

Study Mindmap

Getting ready for an exam can feel overwhelming, especially when you’re unsure about the topics you might have overlooked. At InsureTutor, our innovative preparation tool includes mindmaps designed to highlight the subjects and concepts that require extra focus. Let us guide you in creating a personalized mindmap to ensure you’re fully equipped to excel on exam day.

 

Get Ohio Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam Premium Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 15 Days

Last Updated: 16 August 25
15 Days Unlimited Access
USD5.3 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 30 Days

Last Updated: 16 August 25
30 Days Unlimited Access
USD3.3 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 60 Days

Last Updated: 16 August 25
60 Days Unlimited Access
USD2.0 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 180 Days

Last Updated: 16 August 25
180 Days Unlimited Access
USD0.8 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 365 Days

Last Updated: 16 August 25
365 Days Unlimited Access
USD0.4 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Why Candidates Trust Us

Our past candidates loves us. Let’s see how they think about our service

Get The Dream Job You Deserve

Get all premium practice questions in one minute

smartmockups_m0nwq2li-1