North Carolina Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam

Premium Practice Questions

By InsureTutor Exam Team

Want To Get More Free Practice Questions?

Input your email below to receive Part Two immediately

Start Set 2 With Google Login

Here are 14 in-depth Q&A study notes to help you prepare for the exam.

Explain the concept of “bad faith” in the context of North Carolina insurance claims adjusting, detailing specific actions that could constitute bad faith and the potential legal ramifications for an insurer found to be acting in bad faith. Reference relevant North Carolina General Statutes.

“Bad faith” in North Carolina insurance claims adjusting refers to an insurer’s unreasonable and unfounded refusal to pay a legitimate claim. This goes beyond simple negligence and involves a deliberate or reckless disregard for the insured’s rights. Actions constituting bad faith can include unreasonably delaying claim processing, denying a claim without proper investigation, misrepresenting policy language, or offering a settlement substantially lower than the claim’s value. North Carolina General Statute § 58-3-40 outlines unfair trade practices, which can form the basis of a bad faith claim. An insurer found liable for bad faith may face compensatory damages, punitive damages (in egregious cases), and attorney’s fees. The insured must prove the insurer acted without reasonable justification in denying or delaying the claim. The burden of proof rests on the claimant to demonstrate the insurer’s actions were in bad faith.

Describe the process of subrogation in North Carolina, including the rights and responsibilities of the insurer and the insured. How does the “made whole” doctrine apply, and what are its implications for the insurer’s ability to recover subrogated funds?

Subrogation in North Carolina allows an insurer who has paid a claim to step into the shoes of the insured and pursue recovery from a third party responsible for the loss. The insurer’s right to subrogation is typically outlined in the insurance policy. The insured has a duty to cooperate with the insurer in the subrogation process. The “made whole” doctrine dictates that the insured must be fully compensated for their loss before the insurer can recover any subrogated funds. This means the insured must be reimbursed for all damages, including deductibles, uninsured losses, and pain and suffering, before the insurer can claim reimbursement. If the insured is not made whole, the insurer’s subrogation rights are limited or extinguished. This doctrine protects the insured from being shortchanged in the recovery process. North Carolina courts generally favor the made whole doctrine, requiring clear and unambiguous policy language to override it.

Explain the concept of “diminution in value” in the context of automobile insurance claims in North Carolina. What factors are considered when determining diminution in value, and what legal precedents guide its assessment?

Diminution in value (DIV) refers to the reduction in a vehicle’s market value after it has been repaired from accident damage, even if repaired to pre-accident condition. North Carolina recognizes DIV as a legitimate component of damages in automobile claims. Factors considered in determining DIV include the severity of the damage, the quality of repairs, the vehicle’s pre-accident condition, its age and mileage, and the reputation of the repair shop. Expert appraisals are often used to assess DIV. Legal precedents, such as relevant court cases, provide guidance on how DIV should be calculated and awarded. The burden of proof rests on the claimant to demonstrate the vehicle has suffered a measurable loss in value due to the accident and subsequent repairs. Insurers are obligated to consider DIV when settling claims, but the amount is often subject to negotiation.

Discuss the role and responsibilities of a claims adjuster in handling workers’ compensation claims in North Carolina. What are the key provisions of the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act that a claims adjuster must be familiar with?

A claims adjuster handling workers’ compensation claims in North Carolina is responsible for investigating the claim, determining eligibility for benefits, managing medical treatment, and ensuring timely payment of benefits to injured employees. They must be familiar with the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act, particularly provisions related to eligibility criteria, types of benefits available (medical, wage replacement, permanent impairment), reporting requirements, and dispute resolution processes. Key provisions include N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97, which outlines the scope of coverage, defines compensable injuries, and establishes the Industrial Commission’s authority. The adjuster must also understand the rules regarding independent medical examinations (IMEs), settlements, and the process for appealing decisions made by the Industrial Commission. Accurate and timely claim handling is crucial to ensure injured workers receive the benefits they are entitled to under the law.

Describe the process of handling a liability claim in North Carolina involving allegations of negligence. What elements must be proven to establish negligence, and what defenses might be raised by the defendant?

Handling a liability claim involving negligence in North Carolina requires a thorough investigation to determine if the defendant’s actions (or inactions) caused the claimant’s injuries. To establish negligence, the claimant must prove four elements: duty of care (the defendant owed a legal duty to the claimant), breach of duty (the defendant failed to meet the required standard of care), causation (the defendant’s breach directly caused the claimant’s injuries), and damages (the claimant suffered actual damages as a result). The defendant might raise several defenses, including contributory negligence (the claimant’s own negligence contributed to the injury, barring recovery in North Carolina), assumption of risk (the claimant knowingly and voluntarily assumed the risk of injury), or lack of proximate cause (the defendant’s actions were not the direct cause of the claimant’s injuries). Thorough documentation and evidence are crucial in evaluating the merits of a negligence claim.

Explain the concept of “uninsured motorist” (UM) and “underinsured motorist” (UIM) coverage in North Carolina. What are the requirements for making a UM/UIM claim, and how does the process differ from a standard liability claim?

Uninsured Motorist (UM) coverage protects insured individuals when they are injured by a driver who has no insurance. Underinsured Motorist (UIM) coverage applies when the at-fault driver’s liability coverage is insufficient to fully compensate the injured party. To make a UM/UIM claim in North Carolina, the insured must prove the other driver was at fault and either uninsured or underinsured. The process differs from a standard liability claim because the insured is essentially making a claim against their own insurance policy. Specific requirements include providing notice to the UM/UIM carrier and, in UIM cases, obtaining consent from the carrier before settling with the at-fault driver’s insurance company. Failure to comply with these requirements can jeopardize the UM/UIM claim. North Carolina law dictates minimum UM/UIM coverage amounts that must be offered with every auto insurance policy.

Discuss the ethical considerations for a claims adjuster in North Carolina. What are some common ethical dilemmas that adjusters face, and what resources are available to help them navigate these situations? Reference the North Carolina Insurance Code of Ethics.

Claims adjusters in North Carolina have a responsibility to act ethically and fairly in handling claims. Common ethical dilemmas include conflicts of interest, pressure to deny or undervalue claims, and maintaining confidentiality. The North Carolina Insurance Code of Ethics (found within the North Carolina Insurance Regulations) provides guidance on ethical conduct, emphasizing honesty, integrity, and fair dealing. Adjusters should avoid situations where their personal interests conflict with their duty to the insurer and the claimant. Resources available to help navigate ethical dilemmas include the adjuster’s company’s ethics policies, the North Carolina Department of Insurance, and professional organizations. Maintaining transparency and seeking guidance when faced with ethical challenges are crucial for upholding the integrity of the claims adjusting profession.

Explain the concept of “bad faith” in the context of North Carolina insurance claims adjusting, detailing specific actions that would constitute bad faith and referencing relevant sections of the North Carolina General Statutes (NCGS) that address insurer responsibilities and potential penalties.

“Bad faith” in North Carolina insurance claims adjusting refers to an insurer’s unreasonable and unfounded refusal to pay a legitimate claim. It involves a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing inherent in every insurance contract. Specific actions that could constitute bad faith include: unreasonably delaying the investigation of a claim, denying a claim without a reasonable basis, failing to properly investigate a claim, misrepresenting policy provisions to avoid coverage, and failing to attempt in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear. NCGS § 58-3-40 outlines unfair claim settlement practices, which can form the basis of a bad faith claim. This statute prohibits insurers from knowingly misrepresenting relevant facts or policy provisions relating to coverages at issue, failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications with respect to claims arising under insurance policies, and failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation and processing of claims arising under insurance policies. Furthermore, NCGS § 75-1.1, the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, can also be invoked in bad faith cases, allowing for treble damages if the insurer’s conduct is deemed unfair or deceptive. The burden of proof lies with the claimant to demonstrate the insurer acted in bad faith.

Describe the process of subrogation in North Carolina, including the insurer’s rights and responsibilities, and how it impacts the insured. Provide examples of situations where subrogation might be pursued and cite relevant North Carolina case law that defines the limits and requirements of subrogation rights.

Subrogation in North Carolina is the legal right of an insurer to pursue a third party who caused a loss to the insured, in order to recover the amount the insurer paid to the insured under the insurance policy. The insurer essentially “steps into the shoes” of the insured to assert the insured’s rights against the responsible party. The insurer’s responsibilities include notifying the insured of their intent to pursue subrogation and protecting the insured’s interests throughout the process. For example, if an insured’s car is damaged in an accident caused by another driver, the insured’s auto insurance company may pay for the repairs and then pursue subrogation against the at-fault driver or their insurance company. Another example is a homeowner’s insurance company paying for damages caused by a contractor’s negligence and then pursuing subrogation against the contractor. North Carolina case law, such as Winkelmann v. Excelsior Ins. Co., clarifies that an insurer’s subrogation rights are derivative of the insured’s rights. The insurer can only recover what the insured could have recovered from the third party. The insured must be made whole before the insurer can retain any subrogation recovery. This is known as the “made whole” doctrine. The insurer also has a duty to act reasonably and in good faith when pursuing subrogation, considering the insured’s interests.

Explain the concept of betterment in property insurance claims in North Carolina. How is betterment handled in adjusting a claim, and what are the ethical considerations for a claims adjuster when dealing with betterment issues?

Betterment in property insurance refers to a situation where a repair or replacement results in the insured property being in better condition than it was immediately before the loss. North Carolina law generally prohibits an insurer from charging the insured for betterment unless the policy specifically allows it. When adjusting a claim, the adjuster must carefully assess whether a repair or replacement will result in betterment. If it does, the adjuster must determine how to handle the situation fairly. One approach is to depreciate the cost of the new item to reflect its pre-loss condition. Another approach, if the policy allows, is to charge the insured for the betterment portion of the repair or replacement. Ethically, the adjuster must be transparent with the insured about the issue of betterment and explain how it will be handled. The adjuster must also ensure that the insured is not unfairly penalized for the betterment. It’s crucial to document the condition of the property before the loss and the reasons for any betterment charges. Misrepresenting the condition of the property or unfairly charging the insured for betterment would be unethical and potentially illegal under NCGS § 58-3-40. The adjuster must prioritize fairness and good faith in all dealings with the insured.

Discuss the requirements for maintaining adjuster licensing in North Carolina, including continuing education requirements, and the potential consequences of failing to meet these requirements as outlined in the North Carolina Administrative Code.

To maintain an adjuster license in North Carolina, adjusters must comply with continuing education (CE) requirements. As stipulated by the North Carolina Department of Insurance (NCDOI) and detailed in the North Carolina Administrative Code, specifically Title 11, Chapter 6, adjusters are generally required to complete a certain number of CE credit hours biennially. The specific number of hours and any specific course requirements (e.g., ethics, law updates) are subject to change and are published by the NCDOI. Failure to meet these CE requirements can result in disciplinary actions, including suspension or revocation of the adjuster’s license. The NCDOI regularly audits adjuster CE compliance. Adjusters are responsible for tracking their CE credits and ensuring timely completion. Additionally, adjusters must notify the NCDOI of any changes in their contact information or any disciplinary actions taken against them in other jurisdictions. Maintaining a current and valid license is crucial for legally operating as an adjuster in North Carolina.

Explain the concept of “concurrent causation” in the context of property insurance claims in North Carolina. How do North Carolina courts typically interpret and apply concurrent causation clauses in insurance policies, and what are the implications for claim adjusters?

Concurrent causation arises when two or more independent causes contribute to a single loss, and at least one of those causes is excluded under the insurance policy. North Carolina courts generally follow the “efficient proximate cause” rule, which holds that the insurer is liable if the covered peril was the efficient proximate cause of the loss, even if an excluded peril contributed to the loss. However, many insurance policies contain anti-concurrent causation clauses, which attempt to exclude coverage when a loss is caused by both a covered and an excluded peril, regardless of which peril was the efficient proximate cause. North Carolina courts have generally upheld anti-concurrent causation clauses, provided they are clear and unambiguous. The leading case is N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hayes, which addressed the enforceability of such clauses. For claim adjusters, understanding concurrent causation and anti-concurrent causation clauses is crucial. The adjuster must carefully investigate all potential causes of the loss and determine whether any excluded perils contributed to the damage. If an anti-concurrent causation clause applies, the adjuster may be able to deny coverage, even if a covered peril also contributed to the loss. However, the adjuster must ensure that the policy language is clear and unambiguous and that the denial is consistent with North Carolina law.

Describe the duties of a claims adjuster in North Carolina when handling a claim involving a potential violation of the North Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (NCUTPA), NCGS § 75-1.1. What specific steps should an adjuster take to avoid potential liability under this Act?

When handling a claim with potential NCUTPA violations, a North Carolina claims adjuster must exercise heightened diligence and adhere to strict ethical and legal standards. The NCUTPA, NCGS § 75-1.1, prohibits unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce. An insurer’s actions in handling a claim can fall under this Act if they are deemed unfair or deceptive. To avoid potential liability, the adjuster should: 1) Conduct a thorough and impartial investigation of the claim, documenting all findings. 2) Communicate clearly and honestly with the claimant, avoiding misrepresentations of policy terms or coverage. 3) Promptly acknowledge and respond to all communications from the claimant. 4) Make a fair and reasonable settlement offer based on the policy terms and the facts of the case. 5) Avoid unreasonable delays in processing the claim. 6) Document the reasons for any denial of coverage. 7) Seek legal counsel if there is any doubt about the proper handling of the claim. 8) Adhere to all applicable regulations and guidelines issued by the North Carolina Department of Insurance. Failure to follow these steps could expose the insurer and the adjuster to liability under the NCUTPA, including treble damages and attorney’s fees.

Explain the concept of “reservation of rights” in North Carolina insurance claims adjusting. What are the requirements for a valid reservation of rights letter, and what are the potential consequences for an insurer who fails to properly reserve their rights?

A “reservation of rights” in North Carolina insurance claims adjusting is a formal notification by an insurer to its insured that it is investigating a claim but reserving its right to deny coverage at a later date if it determines that the policy does not cover the loss. This allows the insurer to investigate the claim without waiving any potential defenses to coverage. For a reservation of rights letter to be valid, it must be timely, clear, and specific. It must be sent to the insured as soon as the insurer becomes aware of facts that might give rise to a coverage defense. The letter must clearly state the specific policy provisions that might preclude coverage and the reasons why those provisions might apply. It should also inform the insured that they have the right to retain their own attorney to protect their interests. If an insurer fails to properly reserve its rights, it may be deemed to have waived its right to deny coverage. This is based on the principle of estoppel, which prevents a party from asserting a right that is inconsistent with its prior conduct. For example, if an insurer investigates a claim without reserving its rights and leads the insured to believe that the claim is covered, the insurer may be estopped from later denying coverage based on a policy exclusion. Therefore, it is crucial for insurers to promptly and properly reserve their rights whenever there is a potential coverage issue.

Get InsureTutor Premium Access

Gain An Unfair Advantage

Prepare your insurance exam with the best study tool in the market

Support All Devices

Take all practice questions anytime, anywhere. InsureTutor support all mobile, laptop and eletronic devices.

Invest In The Best Tool

All practice questions and study notes are carefully crafted to help candidates like you to pass the insurance exam with ease.

Video Key Study Notes

Each insurance exam paper comes with over 3 hours of video key study notes. It’s a Q&A type of study material with voice-over, allowing you to study on the go while driving or during your commute.

Invest In The Best Tool

All practice questions and study notes are carefully crafted to help candidates like you to pass the insurance exam with ease.

Study Mindmap

Getting ready for an exam can feel overwhelming, especially when you’re unsure about the topics you might have overlooked. At InsureTutor, our innovative preparation tool includes mindmaps designed to highlight the subjects and concepts that require extra focus. Let us guide you in creating a personalized mindmap to ensure you’re fully equipped to excel on exam day.

 

Get InsureTutor Premium Access

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 15 Days

Last Updated: 24 April 25
15 Days Unlimited Access
USD5.3 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
1200 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 30 Days

Last Updated: 24 April 25
30 Days Unlimited Access
USD3.3 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
1200 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 60 Days

Last Updated: 24 April 25
60 Days Unlimited Access
USD2.0 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
1200 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 180 Days

Last Updated: 24 April 25
180 Days Unlimited Access
USD0.8 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
1200 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 365 Days

Last Updated: 24 April 25
365 Days Unlimited Access
USD0.4 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
1200 Practice Questions

Why Candidates Trust Us

Our past candidates loves us. Let’s see how they think about our service

Get The Dream Job You Deserve

Get all premium practice questions in one minute

smartmockups_m0nwq2li-1