North Carolina Adjuster License Exam

Premium Practice Questions

By InsureTutor Exam Team

Want To Get More Free Practice Questions?

Input your email below to receive Part Two immediately

[nextend_social_login provider="google" heading="Start Set 2 With Google Login" redirect="https://www.insuretutor.com/insurance-exam-free-practice-questions-set-two-2/" align="center"]

North Carolina Adjuster License Exam Key Exam Concecpts

Here are 14 in-depth Q&A study notes to help you prepare for the exam.

Explain the concept of “bad faith” in insurance claims handling in North Carolina, providing specific examples of adjuster actions that could be considered bad faith and referencing relevant sections of the North Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (NCUTPA) and case law.

“Bad faith” in insurance claims handling occurs when an insurer acts unfairly or dishonestly in processing or denying a claim. In North Carolina, while there isn’t a specific statute defining “bad faith,” it’s primarily addressed through the North Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (NCUTPA), specifically N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-1.1, which prohibits unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce. Adjuster actions that could constitute bad faith include: unreasonably delaying claim investigations, misrepresenting policy provisions to avoid coverage, failing to properly investigate a claim, denying a claim without reasonable basis, and offering a settlement substantially less than the claim’s value. For example, intentionally misinterpreting policy language to deny a legitimate claim for hurricane damage would likely be considered bad faith. Case law, such as Gray v. N.C. Ins. Underwriting Ass’n, provides further guidance. While a simple denial of a claim, even if ultimately proven wrong, does not automatically constitute bad faith, a pattern of unfair or deceptive practices can violate NCUTPA. Claimants can pursue damages under NCUTPA, including treble damages if a violation is proven. The key is demonstrating that the insurer acted with an unwarranted and unreasonable refusal to fulfill its obligations under the insurance contract.

Detail the requirements for continuing education for licensed adjusters in North Carolina, including the number of hours required, the types of courses that qualify, and the consequences of failing to meet these requirements, as outlined by the North Carolina Department of Insurance.

Licensed adjusters in North Carolina are required to complete continuing education (CE) courses to maintain their licenses. As per the North Carolina Department of Insurance regulations, adjusters must complete 24 hours of CE every two years, prior to their license renewal date. Three of these hours must be in ethics, fraud, consumer protection, and suitable sales practices. Qualifying courses must be approved by the Department of Insurance and cover topics related to insurance laws, regulations, policy coverages, claims handling, and ethical conduct. Courses can be completed through various formats, including classroom instruction, online courses, and self-study programs. Failure to complete the required CE hours by the license renewal date can result in penalties, including fines, suspension of the license, or even revocation. Adjusters are responsible for tracking their CE credits and ensuring that they are reported to the Department of Insurance through approved providers. The specific regulations are detailed in the North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 6, which outlines the CE requirements for insurance professionals.

Explain the process for handling a claim involving a total loss vehicle in North Carolina, including the documentation required, the methods for determining the vehicle’s fair market value, and the adjuster’s responsibilities regarding sales tax and vehicle titling, according to North Carolina General Statutes.

When handling a total loss vehicle claim in North Carolina, the adjuster must follow specific procedures to ensure compliance with state laws. The adjuster must obtain documentation such as the police report, vehicle registration, and proof of ownership. To determine the vehicle’s fair market value (FMV), adjusters typically use valuation services like NADA or Kelley Blue Book, considering the vehicle’s condition, mileage, and options prior to the loss. Comparable vehicle sales in the local market are also considered. North Carolina General Statute § 20-71.1 governs the titling of salvage vehicles. The adjuster must provide the claimant with a settlement offer that includes the FMV of the vehicle, less any applicable deductible. The claimant must then transfer ownership of the vehicle to the insurance company by signing the title. The insurance company is responsible for obtaining a salvage title for the vehicle. Regarding sales tax, North Carolina General Statute § 105-164.4 states that sales tax is not applicable to the settlement amount for a total loss vehicle. However, if the claimant purchases a replacement vehicle, they will be responsible for paying sales tax on that purchase. The adjuster must clearly explain these aspects to the claimant.

Describe the duties and responsibilities of an adjuster when handling a workers’ compensation claim in North Carolina, including the reporting requirements, the process for determining compensability, and the benefits available to injured workers under the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act (NCGS Chapter 97).

When handling a workers’ compensation claim in North Carolina, the adjuster has several key duties and responsibilities. First, the adjuster must promptly investigate the claim to determine its compensability under the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act (NCGS Chapter 97). This involves gathering information from the employer, employee, and medical providers. Reporting requirements are crucial. The adjuster must file a Form 19 (Employer’s Report of Employee’s Injury to the Industrial Commission) with the North Carolina Industrial Commission within five days of receiving notice of the injury. If the claim is accepted, the adjuster must also file a Form 60 (Payment of Compensation) when payments begin. Determining compensability involves assessing whether the injury arose out of and in the course of employment. This requires evaluating the circumstances of the injury and reviewing medical evidence. Benefits available to injured workers include medical expenses, temporary total disability benefits (TTD), temporary partial disability benefits (TPD), permanent partial disability benefits (PPD), and permanent total disability benefits (PTD). The adjuster must ensure that these benefits are paid in accordance with NCGS Chapter 97. The adjuster must also manage medical care and facilitate the employee’s return to work.

Explain the concept of subrogation in insurance, detailing how it applies in North Carolina, the adjuster’s role in pursuing subrogation, and any relevant North Carolina statutes or case law that govern subrogation rights.

Subrogation is the legal right of an insurer to pursue a third party who caused a loss to the insured, in order to recover the amount of the claim paid to the insured. In North Carolina, subrogation allows the insurer to “step into the shoes” of the insured and assert their rights against the responsible party. The adjuster plays a crucial role in pursuing subrogation. This involves identifying potential third-party liability, gathering evidence to support the subrogation claim, and negotiating with the responsible party or their insurer. Evidence may include police reports, witness statements, and expert opinions. While North Carolina does not have a specific statute dedicated solely to subrogation, the right is recognized under common law and is often addressed within the context of specific types of insurance policies. Case law, such as Integon General Insurance Corporation v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, provides guidance on the application of subrogation principles. The adjuster must be aware of any applicable policy provisions that may affect subrogation rights, such as waivers of subrogation. The adjuster must also consider the Made Whole Doctrine, which generally requires the insured to be fully compensated for their loss before the insurer can assert its subrogation rights.

Describe the process for handling a claim involving a homeowner’s insurance policy in North Carolina when there is a dispute over the scope of damage or the cost of repairs, including the use of appraisal and the role of the North Carolina Department of Insurance in resolving disputes.

When a dispute arises over the scope of damage or the cost of repairs in a homeowner’s insurance claim in North Carolina, the policy typically provides for an appraisal process. This process, outlined in most standard homeowner’s policies, involves each party (the insured and the insurer) selecting a competent and impartial appraiser. The two appraisers then select an umpire. If the appraisers cannot agree on an umpire, a court of record can appoint one. The appraisers independently assess the damage and determine the cost of repairs. If they agree, their decision is binding. If they disagree, they submit their differences to the umpire, whose decision is binding on both parties. The North Carolina Department of Insurance (NCDOI) also plays a role in resolving disputes. While the NCDOI does not have the authority to make binding decisions on claim disputes, it can investigate complaints and mediate between the parties. Filing a complaint with the NCDOI can sometimes lead to a resolution through informal negotiation. However, if appraisal and mediation fail, the insured may need to pursue legal action to resolve the dispute.

Explain the concept of “betterment” in the context of property insurance claims in North Carolina, and how adjusters should handle situations where repairs or replacements result in an improvement to the property beyond its pre-loss condition. Provide examples and reference relevant legal principles.

“Betterment” in property insurance refers to a situation where repairs or replacements following a covered loss result in an improvement to the property, increasing its value beyond its condition before the loss. In North Carolina, the principle of indemnity dictates that the insured should be restored to their pre-loss condition, but not placed in a better position. Adjusters must carefully assess whether repairs constitute betterment. For example, if an older roof is damaged and replaced with a new, upgraded roofing material, the insurer may argue that the insured is receiving a betterment. In such cases, the insurer may only be responsible for the cost of replacing the roof with a material of like kind and quality to the original. The insured would then be responsible for the incremental cost of the upgrade. However, determining what constitutes betterment can be complex. If code upgrades are required during the repair process, the insurer may be responsible for covering those costs, even if they result in a slight improvement to the property. The specific policy language is crucial in determining coverage. While there isn’t a specific North Carolina statute addressing betterment directly, the principle of indemnity, as interpreted through case law and policy provisions, guides the handling of these situations. Adjusters should document their assessment of betterment and clearly explain any cost-sharing arrangements to the insured.

Explain the concept of “constructive total loss” in the context of property insurance claims in North Carolina, and how does it differ from an actual total loss? What specific conditions, as defined by North Carolina insurance regulations, must be met for a property to be considered a constructive total loss?

A constructive total loss occurs when the cost to repair damaged property exceeds its value, or when the property is damaged to the extent that it is impractical or uneconomical to repair. This differs from an actual total loss, where the property is completely destroyed or irreparably damaged. In North Carolina, the determination of a constructive total loss often hinges on the specific policy language and the adjuster’s assessment of repair costs versus the property’s pre-loss value. While North Carolina statutes don’t explicitly define “constructive total loss,” the concept is embedded in insurance contract law and claims handling practices. Adjusters must adhere to fair claims settlement practices as outlined in North Carolina Administrative Code Title 11, Chapter 4, Section .0420, which emphasizes good faith and fair dealing. The adjuster must thoroughly document the damage, obtain accurate repair estimates, and compare these costs to the property’s value to determine if a constructive total loss has occurred. The insured must be informed of the basis for the determination.

Describe the duties and responsibilities of a licensed adjuster in North Carolina when handling a claim involving a potential violation of the North Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (NCUTPA). How does the adjuster balance their duty to the insurer with the need to avoid actions that could be construed as unfair or deceptive under NCUTPA?

When handling a claim with a potential NCUTPA violation, a North Carolina adjuster must act with utmost good faith and fairness. NCUTPA, codified in Chapter 75 of the North Carolina General Statutes, prohibits unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce. An adjuster’s duties include thoroughly investigating the claim, accurately assessing damages, and communicating clearly and honestly with the claimant. To avoid NCUTPA violations, adjusters must refrain from misrepresenting policy provisions, delaying or denying claims without reasonable investigation, and coercing claimants into accepting settlements less than what they are owed. Balancing the duty to the insurer with the need to avoid NCUTPA violations requires transparency and adherence to ethical claims handling practices. Adjusters should document all communications and decisions, seek guidance from supervisors or legal counsel when uncertain, and prioritize fair and equitable treatment of claimants. Violations of NCUTPA can result in significant penalties, including treble damages and attorney’s fees, as outlined in N.C. Gen. Stat. 75-16.

Explain the concept of “betterment” in property insurance claims in North Carolina. How is betterment handled in adjusting a loss, and what are the adjuster’s responsibilities in explaining this concept to the insured? Provide examples of situations where betterment might apply.

“Betterment” in property insurance refers to improvements or upgrades made during repairs that increase the property’s value beyond its pre-loss condition. In North Carolina, insurers are generally not obligated to pay for betterment. The adjuster’s responsibility is to accurately assess the pre-loss condition of the property and ensure that the repairs restore it to that condition, without providing an unwarranted upgrade. The adjuster must clearly explain the concept of betterment to the insured, outlining why the insurer will not cover the cost of the upgrade. For example, if an insured has a roof with a 20-year lifespan and it’s partially damaged after 15 years, the insurer might only pay for the remaining 5 years of life. If the insured chooses to install a more durable, longer-lasting roof, the insurer would not cover the difference in cost, as this constitutes betterment. Clear communication and documentation are crucial to avoid disputes. North Carolina Administrative Code Title 11, Chapter 4, Section .0420 addresses fair claims settlement practices, implicitly requiring adjusters to be transparent and honest in explaining policy provisions and claim adjustments, including betterment.

Describe the process for handling a claim involving a disputed cause of loss in North Carolina. What steps should an adjuster take to investigate and resolve the dispute, and what documentation is required to support the insurer’s position? Refer to specific North Carolina regulations or case law that governs such disputes.

When a cause of loss is disputed in North Carolina, the adjuster must conduct a thorough and impartial investigation. This includes gathering all relevant evidence, such as police reports, witness statements, expert opinions, and policy documentation. The adjuster should also review the policy language to determine whether the claimed cause of loss is covered. If the investigation reveals conflicting information, the adjuster should seek clarification from all parties involved. The adjuster must document all findings and communications in detail. If the insurer denies the claim based on the disputed cause of loss, the denial letter must clearly explain the reasons for the denial and provide specific references to the policy language and evidence supporting the insurer’s position. North Carolina Administrative Code Title 11, Chapter 4, Section .0420 outlines fair claims settlement practices, requiring insurers to conduct reasonable investigations and provide prompt and accurate explanations for claim denials. Case law, such as Dixon v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 328 S.E.2d 592 (N.C. Ct. App. 1985), emphasizes the insurer’s duty to act in good faith and conduct a reasonable investigation before denying a claim.

Explain the concept of “subrogation” in the context of insurance claims in North Carolina. What are the adjuster’s responsibilities in pursuing subrogation rights, and what legal considerations must be taken into account?

Subrogation is the legal right of an insurer to pursue a third party who caused a loss to the insured, in order to recover the amount of the claim paid. In North Carolina, an adjuster has a responsibility to identify and pursue potential subrogation opportunities. This involves investigating the circumstances of the loss to determine if a third party was negligent or otherwise responsible. If subrogation is possible, the adjuster must notify the responsible party of the insurer’s intent to pursue subrogation and gather evidence to support the claim. Legal considerations include statutes of limitations, which limit the time within which a lawsuit can be filed, and the made-whole doctrine, which generally requires the insured to be fully compensated for their loss before the insurer can recover through subrogation. The adjuster must also comply with North Carolina Rule of Professional Conduct 4.1, which prohibits making false statements of material fact or law to a third person. North Carolina General Statute 58-3-100 outlines unfair claim settlement practices, and failure to diligently pursue subrogation when appropriate could be construed as a violation.

Describe the process for handling a claim involving a loss that is potentially covered by multiple insurance policies in North Carolina. How does the adjuster determine which policy is primary and which is excess, and what are the implications for claim payment?

When a loss is covered by multiple insurance policies in North Carolina, the adjuster must determine the order of coverage, i.e., which policy is primary and which is excess. This determination is typically based on the “other insurance” clauses in each policy. These clauses specify how the policy will respond when other insurance is available. Common types of “other insurance” clauses include pro rata, excess, and escape clauses. A pro rata clause provides that each insurer will pay a proportion of the loss based on its policy limits. An excess clause provides that the policy will only pay after all other insurance is exhausted. An escape clause attempts to avoid coverage altogether if other insurance is available, but these are often disfavored by courts. The adjuster must carefully review the “other insurance” clauses in all applicable policies to determine the order of coverage. If the clauses conflict, North Carolina courts will often apply rules of construction to resolve the conflict. The primary policy pays first, up to its policy limits, and the excess policy pays any remaining amount, up to its policy limits. The adjuster must communicate clearly with all insurers involved and coordinate claim payments to ensure that the insured is properly compensated. Failure to properly coordinate coverage could be considered an unfair claim settlement practice under North Carolina Administrative Code Title 11, Chapter 4, Section .0420.

Explain the requirements for continuing education for licensed adjusters in North Carolina. What are the consequences of failing to meet these requirements, and how does the North Carolina Department of Insurance monitor compliance?

Licensed adjusters in North Carolina are required to complete continuing education (CE) courses to maintain their licenses. The specific requirements are outlined in North Carolina General Statute 58-33-130 and North Carolina Administrative Code Title 11, Chapter 6. Adjusters typically need to complete a certain number of CE credit hours every license renewal period, with a portion of those hours often required to be in ethics or North Carolina law. The exact number of hours and specific course requirements can vary, so adjusters must stay informed of the current regulations. Failure to meet the CE requirements can result in penalties, including fines, suspension of the license, or revocation of the license. The North Carolina Department of Insurance (NCDOI) monitors compliance through various methods, including audits of CE records and verification of course completion with approved CE providers. Adjusters are responsible for maintaining their own records of completed CE courses and submitting proof of completion to the NCDOI as required. The NCDOI provides resources and information on approved CE courses and requirements on its website.

Get InsureTutor Premium Access

Enormous Practice Questions
Increase Your Market Value And Competitiveness
Weekly Updated Questions Bank
Mimic The Real Examination Format
Unique Questions Bank By InsuranceExamAcademy
Until You Pass Guarantee

Secure The Next Job Opportunity
Instant Access After Payment
Study Anywhere With Any Devices
Explanation Given For Each & Every Questions
24/7/365 Support
Unlimited Access For Granted Period

Gain An Unfair Advantage

Prepare your insurance exam with the best study tool in the market

Support All Devices

Take all practice questions anytime, anywhere. InsureTutor support all mobile, laptop and eletronic devices.

Invest In The Best Tool

All practice questions and study notes are carefully crafted to help candidates like you to pass the insurance exam with ease.

Video Key Study Notes

Each insurance exam paper comes with over 3 hours of video key study notes. It’s a Q&A type of study material with voice-over, allowing you to study on the go while driving or during your commute.

Invest In The Best Tool

All practice questions and study notes are carefully crafted to help candidates like you to pass the insurance exam with ease.

Study Mindmap

Getting ready for an exam can feel overwhelming, especially when you’re unsure about the topics you might have overlooked. At InsureTutor, our innovative preparation tool includes mindmaps designed to highlight the subjects and concepts that require extra focus. Let us guide you in creating a personalized mindmap to ensure you’re fully equipped to excel on exam day.