New Hampshire Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam

Premium Practice Questions

By InsureTutor Exam Team

Want To Get More Free Practice Questions?

Input your email below to receive Part Two immediately

[nextend_social_login provider="google" heading="Start Set 2 With Google Login" redirect="https://www.insuretutor.com/insurance-exam-free-practice-questions-set-two-2/" align="center"]
Here are 14 in-depth Q&A study notes to help you prepare for the exam.

Explain the concept of “bad faith” in insurance claims handling in New Hampshire, providing specific examples of adjuster actions that could be considered bad faith and referencing relevant New Hampshire statutes or case law.

“Bad faith” in insurance claims handling refers to an insurer’s unreasonable and unfounded refusal to pay a claim covered by the policy. In New Hampshire, while there isn’t a specific statute defining bad faith, the concept is recognized under common law. Examples of adjuster actions that could constitute bad faith include: unreasonably delaying claim investigation, misrepresenting policy provisions to avoid coverage, failing to properly investigate a claim, or offering a settlement substantially less than the claim’s value without reasonable justification. The New Hampshire Supreme Court has addressed bad faith claims, emphasizing the insurer’s duty to act in good faith and deal fairly with its insured. While punitive damages are generally not awarded in contract cases, they may be available in egregious cases of bad faith. Adjusters must adhere to ethical claims handling practices to avoid potential bad faith claims.

Describe the process for handling a claim involving a disputed liability in New Hampshire, outlining the steps an adjuster should take to investigate the claim, determine liability, and negotiate a settlement, while adhering to New Hampshire insurance regulations.

When handling a claim with disputed liability in New Hampshire, the adjuster must conduct a thorough investigation. This includes gathering all relevant information, such as police reports, witness statements, and expert opinions. The adjuster should analyze the evidence to determine the degree of fault of each party involved, considering New Hampshire’s comparative negligence law (RSA 507:7-a). If liability is unclear, the adjuster should continue to investigate and document all findings. Settlement negotiations should be conducted in good faith, with a clear explanation of the basis for any offer. If a settlement cannot be reached, the adjuster should advise the claimant of their right to pursue legal action. Throughout the process, the adjuster must comply with New Hampshire insurance regulations regarding fair claims practices, ensuring timely communication and accurate representation of policy terms.

Discuss the requirements for licensing and continuing education for claims adjusters in New Hampshire, including the types of licenses available, the application process, and the consequences of failing to comply with these requirements.

In New Hampshire, claims adjusters are required to be licensed by the New Hampshire Insurance Department. There are different types of adjuster licenses, including those for property and casualty, workers’ compensation, and public adjusters. The application process typically involves completing an application form, passing an examination, and submitting fingerprints for a background check. Continuing education is required to maintain an adjuster’s license. Adjusters must complete a certain number of credit hours of approved courses every licensing period. Failure to comply with licensing and continuing education requirements can result in fines, suspension, or revocation of the adjuster’s license. The New Hampshire Insurance Department website provides detailed information on licensing requirements and continuing education courses.

Explain the concept of subrogation in insurance claims, detailing how it works in New Hampshire, the adjuster’s role in pursuing subrogation, and any relevant New Hampshire statutes or case law that govern subrogation rights.

Subrogation is the legal right of an insurer to pursue a third party who caused a loss to the insured, in order to recover the amount of the claim paid. In New Hampshire, subrogation rights are generally recognized. The adjuster’s role in pursuing subrogation involves identifying potential third parties responsible for the loss, gathering evidence to support a claim against them, and negotiating with the third party or their insurer to recover the claim amount. New Hampshire law allows insurers to pursue subrogation claims. The Made Whole Doctrine may apply, meaning the insured must be fully compensated for their loss before the insurer can recover through subrogation. Adjusters should be familiar with relevant New Hampshire case law regarding subrogation to effectively pursue these claims.

Describe the process for handling a workers’ compensation claim in New Hampshire, including the adjuster’s responsibilities for investigating the claim, determining eligibility for benefits, and managing medical and indemnity payments, with reference to relevant New Hampshire workers’ compensation laws.

Handling a workers’ compensation claim in New Hampshire requires adherence to RSA 281-A, the state’s workers’ compensation law. The adjuster must promptly investigate the claim to determine if the injury arose out of and in the course of employment. This involves gathering information from the employee, employer, and medical providers. Eligibility for benefits depends on factors such as the employee’s employment status, the nature of the injury, and whether the injury is work-related. The adjuster is responsible for managing medical payments, ensuring they are reasonable and necessary. Indemnity payments, such as temporary total disability benefits, are calculated based on the employee’s average weekly wage. The adjuster must also coordinate return-to-work efforts and manage any permanent impairment benefits. Compliance with New Hampshire workers’ compensation laws is crucial for proper claim handling.

Discuss the ethical considerations for claims adjusters in New Hampshire, providing examples of situations where ethical dilemmas may arise and outlining the adjuster’s responsibilities to act with honesty, integrity, and fairness in all dealings with claimants and other parties.

Claims adjusters in New Hampshire face various ethical considerations in their daily work. These considerations are guided by the principles of honesty, integrity, and fairness. An ethical dilemma may arise when an adjuster suspects fraud but lacks sufficient evidence to prove it. In such cases, the adjuster must conduct a thorough investigation without making unsubstantiated accusations. Another dilemma may occur when an adjuster is pressured to deny a valid claim to save the insurer money. In this situation, the adjuster has a responsibility to uphold the policy terms and pay the claim fairly. Adjusters must avoid conflicts of interest and disclose any relationships that could compromise their impartiality. Maintaining confidentiality and respecting the privacy of claimants are also essential ethical obligations. Adhering to a code of ethics and seeking guidance when faced with ethical dilemmas are crucial for responsible claims handling.

Explain the concept of appraisal in property insurance claims in New Hampshire, detailing the circumstances under which appraisal can be invoked, the process for selecting appraisers and an umpire, and the binding nature of the appraisal award, referencing relevant New Hampshire statutes or case law.

Appraisal is a process used to resolve disputes regarding the amount of loss in a property insurance claim. In New Hampshire, appraisal can be invoked when the insured and the insurer disagree on the value of the damaged property. The policy typically outlines the appraisal process. Each party selects a competent and impartial appraiser, and the two appraisers then select an umpire. If the appraisers cannot agree on an umpire, a court can appoint one. The appraisers independently assess the loss, and if they agree, their determination is binding. If they disagree, the umpire reviews the assessments and makes a decision. The appraisal award, agreed upon by two of the three parties (the two appraisers or one appraiser and the umpire), is binding on both the insured and the insurer, subject to limited grounds for appeal, such as fraud or bias. New Hampshire law recognizes the validity of appraisal clauses in insurance contracts.

Explain the concept of “bad faith” in the context of New Hampshire insurance claims adjusting, detailing specific actions that might constitute bad faith and the potential legal ramifications for an insurer found to be acting in bad faith. Reference relevant sections of the New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated (RSA).

“Bad faith” in insurance claims adjusting refers to an insurer’s deliberate or reckless failure to fulfill its contractual obligations to the insured. This can manifest in various ways, including unreasonable denial of a claim, inadequate investigation, or undue delay in processing a claim. Specific actions that might constitute bad faith include misrepresenting policy provisions, failing to acknowledge and act promptly upon communications, failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims, and compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due under the policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered. Under New Hampshire law, while there isn’t a specific statute explicitly defining “bad faith,” the concept is recognized through common law and implied in the covenant of good faith and fair dealing inherent in every insurance contract. RSA 417:4-a addresses unfair claim settlement practices, which, while not directly labeled “bad faith,” can form the basis of a bad faith claim. These practices include knowingly misrepresenting facts or policy provisions, failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications with respect to claims, and failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims arising under insurance policies. If an insurer is found to be acting in bad faith, they may be liable for damages beyond the policy limits, including compensatory damages for emotional distress and, in some cases, punitive damages. The insured may also be able to recover attorney’s fees and costs associated with pursuing the bad faith claim. The burden of proof rests on the insured to demonstrate that the insurer acted in bad faith.

Describe the process for handling a claim involving subrogation in New Hampshire. What are the adjuster’s responsibilities in protecting the insurer’s subrogation rights, and what legal considerations must be taken into account?

Subrogation is the legal right of an insurer to pursue a third party who caused a loss to the insured, in order to recover the amount of the claim paid to the insured. In New Hampshire, the claims adjuster plays a crucial role in protecting the insurer’s subrogation rights. The process begins with identifying potential third-party liability during the initial claim investigation. This involves gathering evidence such as police reports, witness statements, and expert opinions to determine if a third party’s negligence or intentional act caused the loss. The adjuster must then provide timely notice to the potentially liable party of the insurer’s subrogation interest. This notice should include details of the loss, the amount paid to the insured, and a demand for reimbursement. The adjuster must also take steps to preserve evidence and prevent the insured from releasing the third party from liability. This may involve obtaining a written agreement from the insured not to settle with the third party without the insurer’s consent. Legal considerations include New Hampshire’s statute of limitations for the underlying cause of action, which dictates the time frame within which the insurer must file a lawsuit against the third party. The adjuster must also be aware of the made-whole doctrine, which generally requires the insured to be fully compensated for their losses before the insurer can assert its subrogation rights. The New Hampshire Supreme Court has addressed subrogation rights in various cases, providing guidance on the application of these principles.

Explain the concept of “betterment” in property insurance claims adjusting in New Hampshire. How does it affect the settlement of a claim, and what are the adjuster’s responsibilities in addressing betterment issues? Provide examples.

“Betterment” in property insurance claims adjusting refers to a situation where the repair or replacement of damaged property results in an improvement in its value or condition compared to its pre-loss state. In New Hampshire, insurers are generally not required to pay for betterment. The principle behind this is that the insured should be indemnified for their loss, but not unjustly enriched. The adjuster’s responsibility is to accurately assess the extent of the damage and determine whether any proposed repairs or replacements would result in betterment. If betterment is involved, the adjuster must explain this to the insured and deduct the betterment portion from the claim settlement. For example, if a roof that was 20 years old is damaged in a storm and needs to be replaced, the new roof has a longer lifespan and therefore greater value than the old roof. The insurer may deduct a portion of the replacement cost to account for the betterment. Another example is if outdated wiring is damaged and needs to be replaced with modern, safer wiring. The insurer may only pay for the cost of replacing the wiring with wiring of similar age and condition, or deduct the difference in cost between the old and new wiring. The adjuster must clearly document the betterment deduction and explain the rationale to the insured, ensuring compliance with New Hampshire insurance regulations and fair claims practices.

Discuss the requirements for continuing education for licensed claims adjusters in New Hampshire. What are the consequences of failing to meet these requirements, and how does the New Hampshire Insurance Department monitor compliance?

Licensed claims adjusters in New Hampshire are required to complete continuing education (CE) courses to maintain their licenses. The specific requirements are outlined by the New Hampshire Insurance Department. Generally, adjusters must complete a certain number of CE credit hours within a specified period, typically a two-year license renewal cycle. These courses must be approved by the Insurance Department and cover topics relevant to insurance law, claims adjusting practices, ethics, and related subjects. The consequences of failing to meet the CE requirements can include suspension or revocation of the adjuster’s license. The New Hampshire Insurance Department monitors compliance through various methods, including requiring adjusters to report their completed CE credits upon license renewal. The Department may also conduct audits of CE providers and licensees to verify compliance. Adjusters are responsible for maintaining records of their completed CE courses and providing documentation to the Department upon request. Failure to comply with CE requirements can also result in fines or other disciplinary actions. The specific regulations regarding CE requirements for adjusters can be found on the New Hampshire Insurance Department’s website and in the relevant sections of the New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated (RSA).

Describe the process for handling a claim where there is a dispute over coverage in New Hampshire. What steps should the adjuster take to investigate the claim, communicate with the insured, and resolve the coverage dispute? Reference relevant case law or regulations.

When a coverage dispute arises in New Hampshire, the claims adjuster must follow a specific process to ensure fair and compliant handling of the claim. First, the adjuster must thoroughly investigate the claim to gather all relevant facts and policy information. This includes reviewing the policy language, declarations page, and any endorsements to determine the scope of coverage. The adjuster should also obtain statements from the insured and any witnesses, and gather any other evidence relevant to the claim. Next, the adjuster must communicate clearly and promptly with the insured regarding the coverage dispute. This communication should include a written explanation of the reasons for the coverage denial or limitation, citing specific policy provisions and relevant facts. The adjuster should also provide the insured with an opportunity to present additional information or arguments in support of coverage. If the coverage dispute cannot be resolved through communication and negotiation, the adjuster should consult with legal counsel to determine the appropriate course of action. This may involve seeking a declaratory judgment from a court to determine the coverage issue. The adjuster must also be aware of New Hampshire’s unfair claim settlement practices regulations (RSA 417:4-a), which prohibit insurers from misrepresenting policy provisions or denying claims without a reasonable basis. Case law in New Hampshire also provides guidance on the interpretation of insurance policies and the resolution of coverage disputes.

Explain the concept of “concurrent causation” in the context of property insurance claims in New Hampshire. How does it impact claim settlement, and what are the adjuster’s responsibilities in determining whether concurrent causation applies?

Concurrent causation arises when two or more independent causes contribute to a single loss, and at least one of those causes is covered by the insurance policy while another is excluded. The application of concurrent causation principles can significantly impact claim settlement in New Hampshire. The adjuster’s primary responsibility is to thoroughly investigate the loss to determine all contributing causes. This requires gathering evidence, such as expert opinions and weather reports, to establish the sequence of events and the relative contribution of each cause. If a covered peril is a concurrent cause of the loss, even if an excluded peril also contributed, the claim may be covered, depending on the specific policy language and applicable case law. New Hampshire courts generally follow the efficient proximate cause rule, which holds that if a covered peril sets in motion a chain of events leading to a loss, the loss is covered even if an excluded peril is also involved. However, some policies may contain anti-concurrent causation clauses, which specifically exclude coverage for losses caused directly or indirectly by an excluded peril, regardless of any other cause contributing to the loss. The adjuster must carefully analyze the policy language and applicable case law to determine whether concurrent causation applies and how it affects the claim settlement. Proper documentation of the investigation and the rationale for the coverage decision is crucial.

Describe the process for handling a claim involving a minor in New Hampshire. What specific legal considerations and requirements must an adjuster be aware of when negotiating a settlement with a minor or their legal representative?

Handling a claim involving a minor in New Hampshire requires special attention due to the legal limitations on a minor’s capacity to enter into binding agreements. An adjuster cannot directly negotiate a settlement with a minor. Instead, negotiations must occur with the minor’s legal guardian or a court-appointed representative, such as a guardian ad litem. Before a settlement can be finalized, it typically requires court approval. This is to ensure that the settlement is in the best interests of the minor. The adjuster must be prepared to provide the court with all relevant information about the claim, including the nature and extent of the minor’s injuries, the proposed settlement amount, and the reasons why the settlement is considered fair and reasonable. The court will scrutinize the settlement to ensure that it adequately compensates the minor for their losses and that the funds are properly protected for the minor’s future needs. This may involve establishing a guardianship or trust account to manage the settlement funds until the minor reaches the age of majority. The adjuster must also be aware of any applicable statutes of limitations that may affect the minor’s claim. In New Hampshire, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims is generally three years, but this may be tolled (suspended) during the minor’s minority. The adjuster should consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Get InsureTutor Premium Access

Gain An Unfair Advantage

Prepare your insurance exam with the best study tool in the market

Support All Devices

Take all practice questions anytime, anywhere. InsureTutor support all mobile, laptop and eletronic devices.

Invest In The Best Tool

All practice questions and study notes are carefully crafted to help candidates like you to pass the insurance exam with ease.

Video Key Study Notes

Each insurance exam paper comes with over 3 hours of video key study notes. It’s a Q&A type of study material with voice-over, allowing you to study on the go while driving or during your commute.

Invest In The Best Tool

All practice questions and study notes are carefully crafted to help candidates like you to pass the insurance exam with ease.

Study Mindmap

Getting ready for an exam can feel overwhelming, especially when you’re unsure about the topics you might have overlooked. At InsureTutor, our innovative preparation tool includes mindmaps designed to highlight the subjects and concepts that require extra focus. Let us guide you in creating a personalized mindmap to ensure you’re fully equipped to excel on exam day.

 

Get New Hampshire Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam Premium Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 15 Days

Last Updated: 15 August 25
15 Days Unlimited Access
USD5.3 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 30 Days

Last Updated: 15 August 25
30 Days Unlimited Access
USD3.3 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 60 Days

Last Updated: 15 August 25
60 Days Unlimited Access
USD2.0 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 180 Days

Last Updated: 15 August 25
180 Days Unlimited Access
USD0.8 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Claims Adjuster Insurance Exam 365 Days

Last Updated: 15 August 25
365 Days Unlimited Access
USD0.4 Per Day Only

The practice questions are specific to each state.
3100 Practice Questions

Why Candidates Trust Us

Our past candidates loves us. Let’s see how they think about our service

Get The Dream Job You Deserve

Get all premium practice questions in one minute

smartmockups_m0nwq2li-1